引用本文
  •    [点击复制]
  •    [点击复制]
PDF HTML全文阅读
本文已被:浏览 1803次   下载 1113 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
踝周神经阻滞麻醉联合“牛鼻子”引流术在糖尿病足清创中的应用效果
张伟,王建纲,马瑞鹏,段成刚,武静
太原钢铁集团有限公司总医院山西医科大学附属第六医院血管外科太原 030000
摘要:
目的:研究踝周神经阻滞麻醉联合“牛鼻子”引流术在糖尿病足清创中的应用效果。方法:选取我院收治的糖尿病足患者104例,分为常规清创组(GG组)53例,微创清创组(MG组)51例,比较两组间糖尿病足类型分布以及大、小截肢发生率的差异,比较两组间多个时点在溃疡面积、创面渗出量、VAS疼痛评分及心理量表评分的差别。比较两组间不同时点空腹血糖、白细胞计数(WBC)、高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平的差异。结果:两组的糖尿病足类型分布均包括缺血型、神经型及混合型,无统计学差异(P>0.05);GG组大截肢发生率高于MG组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而两组小截肢发生率间无明显差别(P>0.05);随着时间推移,MG组创面渗出量、VAS疼痛评分、心理量表评分优于GG组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组间空腹血糖、WBC、hs-CRP水平,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),MG组TNF-α水平低于GG组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:采用踝周神经阻滞麻醉方式进行清创术后行“牛鼻子”引流术治疗糖尿病足感染的临床效果良好,值得临床推广应用。
关键词:  踝周神经阻滞  牛鼻子引流术  糖尿病足
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-6948.2023.01.006
基金项目:太原市医学重点学科高端人才培养计划(20190929);太原钢铁(集团)有限公司科研项目(2021-21)
Application of ankle peri nerve block anesthesia combined with nose ring drain in debridement of diabetic foot
ZHANG Wei,WANG Jian-gang,MA rui-peng
Department of Vascular Surgery, General Hospitalof TISCO, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030000, China
Abstract:
Objective To study the application and effect of perineal block anesthesia combined with nose ring drain in debridement of diabetic foot. Methods 104 DF patients were admitted to our hospital. A prospective cohort study was used to obtain 53 patients in the conventional debridement group (GG) and 51 patients in the minimally invasive debridement group (MG). The differences in the distribution of diabetic foot types between the two groups were compared. The differences between the two groups in the occurrence of large and small amputations were observed. The number of nodes in the two groups varied in the area of ulcer, the amount of wound exudation, and the VAS pain score. Differences in psychological scale scores. The levels of fasting blood glucose control, leukocyte count (WBC), C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and tumor necrosis factorα(TNF-α) were compared between the two groups in different time. Results There were no significant differences in the distribution of diabetic foot types between the two groups, including and blood loss(P>0.05). The incidence of major amputation in G G group w as s ignifi cantly higher than that in M G group ( P<0.05), but t h e r e wa s n o si g n i fic a nt d i f f e r e n c e b e t we e n t h e t wo g r o u p s ( P> 0 . 0 5 ) ; Ov e r t i m e , MG g r o u p wa s si g n i fic a nt l y better than GG group in wound exudation, VAS pain score and psychological scale score (P<0.05); There was no significant difference in fasting blood glucose level, WBC level and hs-CRP level between the two groups (P>0.05), but the level of TNF-α in MG group was significantly lower than that in GG group (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of perineural nerve block anesthesia for debridement of diabetic foot infection is effective. It is worthy of clinical promotion.
Key words:  Peri ankle nerve block  nose ring drain  diabetic foot

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫